Here are our handpicked suggestions for 'lifeselector premium accounts'. Our editors have chosen several links from pastebin.com, webcracking.com and edukon.net. Additionally, you can browse 4 more links that might be useful for you.
Tyler Childs Yeah, I mean, with some of the html5 in forums, you could get some of that for free. But I guess, to that point, there's the trade off is also you probably have some rules that are not going to be native to the browser. So you're gonna have to write that in JavaScript. So you might have to do the class anyways. At that point, or add the pseudo selector.
Free Life Selector Credits Hack
Tyler Childs No, I think I think that's huge. Now you have a fallback experience that you can control a lot easier. Exactly. Yeah. I agree, I think because before you just have to, like, do this, like weird, you know that the browser is going to ignore CSS declarations that it doesn't understand. But it's so much more confusing to look at that versus like all of your support logic is encapsulated separately. That's really cool. One thing I did see, which honestly is not going to affect me in any way, there's now proper, like email styling, they're actually adding more for emails and getting trying to get more from the spec to the email clients to be supporting this more. I haven't worked in doing email templates in forever. But I always hated it so much like you're basically going back to tables, just to be able to support some of these old clients. And a lot of the CSS was not supported. You do that on a website. But no, we cannot do that on the email client. So I thought that was cool. Just to even see this old old technology starting to get some life. Breathe into it. Nice. Yeah. So one of the other things that I'm excited about is Is the revert value that you can apply to a CSS property. And you can use that to basically scope a CSS selector or a rule set. We can choose Cheers. Cheers. So you can basically scope a rule set to basically remove all of the inherited and cascading values for that rule set. So you could use the all property with revert, and that would just clear out everything that would have been applied to it previously. And then you can just go start from scratch from there. Awesome. That's actually pretty powerful. I like that. So we've talked about some of the future stuff in CSS. How has it changed since you started writing UI code? Go back to your days, which honestly, I had mentioned tables for email. I started out writing HTML when tables were a thing divs were not so it has changed drastically. But I'm interested to hear all of you
Jem Young bit more? Exactly. No, you see talks where people talk about like, Oh, we didn't fit into the style guide or design spec or whatever. But in reality It's like maybe one team out of the entire company. And it's never good. What what I've seen increasingly is that we talked about it briefly on the show is the rise of maybe the UX engineer, who is a master of like CSS and accessibility and HTML specs, or versus more of a JavaScript engineer who builds UI and expert frameworks, things like that. I'm increasingly thinking like, there's no way to be an expert at both. It's just, they're just too large spheres to be good. And increasingly, it's like, we're good at JavaScript. Great. And then we hack our way through CSS, because we have to and like CSS will just work. And generally, unless you're just doing a really, really, really bad, it's not gonna be a major performance. It you do get scalability issues when you try to extend it, but in general, it's like, you could write a lot of bad selectors and things like that, but it'll still work. Cheers. Cheers. I think for me thinking about one of the biggest problems that you face in CSS is very Adding, like font sizes and line heights, and I feel like those are some of the properties that people battle with the most. And I think those are because they're inherited, it's harder to know exactly where all of those spaces are coming from, if you're not super familiar with, like CSS and the type biography,
2ff7e9595c
Comments